Thursday, March 27, 2014

10 Reasons Why Alex Jones Should Be Tried For Treason
The goal of Alex Jones and his Zionist handlers is to get America to destroy herself. This is done the same way that Russia was destroyed under Stalin; dividing and then collapsing society upon itself by baiting Americans into a violent revolution against their own police and military.

Alex Jones is the founder of and, and the self-proclaimed grand-daddy of the 9/11 Truth movement. He has made and produced countless documentaries, the most famous of which are Terrorstorm, End Game, The Obama Deceptionand Fall of the Republic. While many people have enjoyed listening to his radio show, patriotic Americans are now starting to question his true motives.

 1. STRATFOR Intelligence Operative
 2. End Game
 3. The Stochastic Terrorist
 4. The Y2K Beta Test
 5. Assassination of William “Bill” Cooper
 6. Alex Jones goes COINTELPRO at the Austin Gun Rally
 7. The Terror Predictions
 8. Denial of Zionism
 9. The Millionaire Truther
 10. The Super Bowl XLV Nuclear Terror Plot

The Real Vampires: An Insider’s View of Banks

The Inside Scoop from Bill Clinton’s Mentortragedy and hope


By Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall

Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley* (1966 Macmillan) is an exacting account of how the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the European central banks, and the giant investment banks that dominate them (e.g. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan) came to control all western governments.
According to Quigley, banks have controlled western society – by manipulating the money supply – since the creation of the Bank of England and the fractional reserve lending system in 1694. Moreover, owing to the secrecy under which they operate, Quigley asserts that most elected officials are totally unaware of the immense control central and investment banks exert over the so-called democratic process.

CIA Document 1035-960: Foundation of a Weaponized Term

CIA Document 1035-960: Foundation of a Weaponized Term 52

“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.

Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

March 25-26, 2014 -- McCarthyism returning to America

The neocons always find it in their best interests to demonize those who oppose their expansionist and jingoistic policies. During the U.S. war against Iraq, those Americans who opposed military action were accused by the neocons of being Saddam Hussein supporters. Now, those Americans who oppose the ratcheting up of tensions with Russia over Crimea and Ukraine are being called Vladimir Putin "apologists" and "Russian collaborators." In some cases, certain neocon propaganda mills, like the U.S. Naval War College's National Security Affairs department, a hotbed for "neocon think," has used Twitter and other social media to question the loyalty of individuals like New York University professor Stephen F. Cohen, former Republican presidential contender Ron Paul, and others of being agents for the Kremlin.

This talk hearkens back to the "Red baiting" days of Senator Joseph McCarthy. Although today's Russia is totally capitalist with only a noisy Communist Party in opposition to the Putin government, that has not stopped neocons from resurrecting McCarthyite tactics to question those who do not want to see a further deterioration in U.S.-Russian relations and a new Cold War.

The neocons use fronts in the non-profit and media worlds to carry their dangerous defamation of Americans who understand Russia's problems with Ukraine and the danger of a Nazi- and fascist-infused regime seizing power in Ukraine. Chief among the neocon defamation water carriers are the pro-Obama sycophantic Daily Beast and its newly-revised Newsweek publication, as well as the hopelessly neocon The Atlantic, The New Republic, Fox News, Business, The Weekly Standard, as well as the tired talking heads dispatched by the Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute to clutter the airways with insane revised Cold War babble.

But it is the notion of creating new "blacklists" among some in the neocon crowd that should every decent American concerned. It is the usual method of the insensitive right wing to start with a few names on a list, people and organizations like NYU's Cohen; his wife, Katrina vanden Heuvel and The Nation magazine for which she is editor; and former U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union Jack Matlock. The neocons, who are nothing more than modern-day Nazis wearing Brooks Brothers suits, then add to their lists as the situation warrants. The Daily Beast's James Kirchik has been at the forefront of attacking Cohen. Kirchik's campaign against Cohen has prompted uglier talk, for example, articles like that in the right-wing Frontpage that Cohen and his wife, as well as The Nation, are "Communist sympathizers." Russia expert Dmitri Simes, the president of the Center for the National Interest, has also been labeled a Kremlin collaborator by the neocons.

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, victims of Red baiting were largely targeted in "whispering campaigns" by their detractors. Today, however, with Twitter, Facebook, and other social media, the "whisperers" are out in the open with their diatribes and Orwellian "two minutes of hate" campaigns.

Today, it is The Daily Beast and Frontpage Magazine that create virtual blacklists. During McCarthy's time, it was magazines like Counterattack that played a similar list-making role. Owned by a shadowy company called American Business Consultants, Inc., Counterattack labeled individuals as Communists or "fellow travelers." The company also published a book titled "Red Channels," which provided a long list of accused Communists and sympathizers. Today, there is no longer a Counterattack or sister publications like Thunderbolt, Common Sense, and The Cross and the Flag, but we have The Daily Beast, which attacked this editor last year in a vicious campaign for disclosing the National Security Agency's agreements with various European signals intelligence agencies, to play the role of creating lists of "disloyal" Americans.

In Joe McCarthy's day it was Counterattack that generated lists of disloyal American "agents" of Moscow. Today, it is The Daily Beast that fulfills the same role.

During the McCarthy era, Nazi emigrés from eastern Europe, including Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Estonia, Romania, and White Russia assisted the right-wing in helping to demonize certain Americans who were opposed to a Cold War with the USSR. Today, this role as been assumed by others from eastern and central Europe. Some, like those who work for the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty, are paid by the American taxpayers. Others, ike those who work for the Open Society Institute and its offshoots, are paid by the Hungarian-born billionaire hedge fund mogul George Soros.

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Who have been the victims of "executive assassination" in America? Without exception, the guns of Wall Street have been aimed at the chief exponents of what is called "The American System of Political Economy."

The American System is not Keynesianism or socialism; not libertarianism or anarchism; but the system combining a national bank, a protective tariff, restraints on financial speculators and support for manufacturing, agriculture and the general welfare. Among the martyrs of this system are:

Alexander Hamilton: The architect of America's first national bank, monetary, infrastructure and industrial policies. Hamilton was murdered in a duel by Aaron Burr, the founder of what is now JP Morgan Chase Bank. Burr tried to sell the Louisiana territory to the British, and later advised the presidency of Andrew Jackson.

Abraham Lincoln: The "great emancipator" was also the founder of America's rail and steel industries, its land grant Universities, the Homestead Act, enactor of its highest protective tariff, all in 4 years. Assassin John Wilkes Booth has been linked to a wide-ranging conspiracy in the service of London banks.

James Garfield, William McKinley and Warren Harding: These 3 Lincoln Republicans were all champions of high protective tariffs and opponents of British imperialism. Garfield and McKinley were shot by "lone nuts" and Harding, also a target of the Teapot Dome scandal, is suspected to have been poisoned.

Franklin D. Roosevelt: The enemy of Wall Street, fascism and colonialism, and champion of American working man, FDR was America's longest-serving president for good reason. He survived several early assassination attempts, including the one that felled Chicago mayor Anton Cermak. Though his death is assumed to have been due to a stroke, Josef Stalin confided in FDR's son Elliot that his father had been poisoned by "The Churchill Gang."

John F. Kennedy: Kennedy's "moon shot" mentality, his caution on the Vietnam war and firing of his warmonger cabinet, his hostility to Wall Street interests and cartels, and his introduction of US Treasury money (1964 silver quarters) were among the reasons he became intolerable to Wall Street and London.

If you believe the myth of "lone nuts," you owe yourself a listen to JFK's haunting "Secret Societies" speech:
The Tariff Democrats were in favor of was rather high as well, a 25% effective tariff. Also Harding and Coolidge slashed income taxes drastically for the top 2% of the country, this is not exactly an Administration that should be thought highly of. That McKinley is underappreciated, of that there is little doubt. Also the silver dollars conspiracy is not a solid theory. In Modern Monetary economics inflation has remained quite low. Metallism is no basis, we now know, for a monetary system, only the national economy itself is.
  • United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) I agree with your last point. Garfield and McKinley were in favor of bimetallism (currency backed by silver and gold), which was at least an improvement over gold-backed currency, as silver was easier to obtain, and would allow for modest inflation so borrowers could pay their debts more easily (see WJ Bryan's Cross of Gold speech). They all would have been better off with a national bank, as the founders had intended. But it's not so easy to do when you get shot dead a couple months or years into your term.

    We can't always apply our viewpoints to historical events. Here's background on the Kennedy silver coinage issue: - I suspect Kennedy's intentions were similar to those of the bimetallists; to keep control of the US silver supply, and to exert some control over the Fed. Of the above list, Hamilton, Lincoln and FDR showed how it's done, though even their methods could be improved by a purely fiat money based on federal lending for productive investments.
    This executive order delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury the president's ...See More
  • United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) Also, who are these tariff Democrats you speak of? Wilson – who lowered rates by 15%? FDR was the first decent Democratic president, and by that time, the Democrats had basically inherited the old Republican policies.
  • Alexander Grable The Tariff from the Revenue Act is estimated to have put the effective dutiable as high as 26% lower than it was to be sure, but still plenty high. In any case at that time America was the foremost industrial power trading with countries like France, Britain and Germany which were comparable in living standards to the United States.
    The United States Revenue Act of 1913 also known as the Tariff Act, Underwood Ta...See More
  • Alexander Grable A far better thing for this page to focus on would be, in my view, the excessive demonization of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. Did it worsen the Depression? Yes. Was it a huge factor? No. The issue was falling income and deflation not tariffs.
  • United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) There are actually good arguments based on production statistics that Smoot-Hawley reduced the severity of the depression. I don't think it will be of much interest to this page, but it's certainly a useful argument to have against libertarians who have just enough brain power to memorize the words "Smoot-Hawley".
    for one read his speech to be referring to communism, yes. That doesn't mean the same cautions can't be applied to nasty people and groups today. Do you see it differently, H. K.?
    • United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) While this was a minor detail of the post, and not something worth dwelling on, I would have to give JFK more credit for being able to perceive greater threats to America than communism. He says,

      "[T]here is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand it's meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment."

      Why would he be pleading with the press to help him warn anyone about communism? This is 7 years after the McCarthy hearings, it's not an unknown or taboo subject, and "communists" don't have the ability to censor and conceal American policy. When you hear him describe a "ruthless, monolithic conspiracy," keep in mind he's already being warned by General MacArthur about the Wall Street agents in his own cabinet.
      Two of these presidents--Lincoln and Kennedy--wanted to abolish the Federal Reserve banking system and an interest-based monetary system, and the bankers couldn't stand for that, so POW POW POW.
      United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) Don't forget about Hamilton (albeit not a president)! We did a post some weeks ago about the context of the Burr/Hamilton duel, where Burr established the Manhattan company specifically to undermine Hamilton's national bank. Hamilton dragged Burr's dirty deeds out into public view, a public pissing match ensued, and the rest is history!

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Against Heresy Part 1; Great Resource on Gnosticism, Gnostics, Apocrypha, Dead Sea Scroll, Audiobook

The book was written by Irenaeus, the Bishop of Lugdunum during the heyday of Gnosticism, 2nd Century.
The goal of this book was to bring up all the doctrines and arguments of Gnosticism, and then bring counter arguments (of orthodox Christianity) to crush them.
Therefore, with this book, you can listen and learn all the details of Gnosticism and ignore the part (the part where Irenaeus is inserting his opinions) why orthodox Christianity is superior than Gnosticism, etc.
Against Heresy Part 1; Great Resource for Gnosticism & Gnostics, Apocrypha, Dead Sea Scroll, Audiobook, written by Irenaeus.

Friday, March 14, 2014

9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once

The Clique that Sold Us the Iraq War

The Clique that Sold Us the Iraq War

Almost the entire Iraq-war clique, advocated the war from 1998 on. 9/11 was only a convenient pretext. Amazingly almost all were members of just two organizations: IASPS and PNAC. Both were neoconservative, and there were many links between the two.

IASPS:  Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies
  • "A Jerusalem-based think tank with an office in Washington, D.C."
  • Began promoting the Iraq war in 1996 by lobbying the Israeli government.
  • Richard Perle (later Rumsfeld's Chairman of Defense Policy Board, delivered "Clean Break" report to Israeli Prime Minister.
  • Current views (2010): Obama is the first American president who is a dictator. We should not be surprised if he proves to be the last president.
Members in the Iraq-War clique:
David Wurmser: Middle East advisor to Vice President Cheney
Douglas  Feith: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy until 2005.
Richard  Perle: First Chairman of Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board.
Charles  Fairbanks: Former assistant to and college friend of Wolfowitz.

PNAC:  Project for New American Century
  • The main neocon lobby, it focused first on invading Iraq.
  • Founded 1997, by William Kristol & Robert Kagan.
  • First action: open letter to Clinton advocating Iraq war.
Members in the Iraq-War clique:
Cheney,  Rumsfeld,  Wolfowitz,  Feith,  Bolton,  Libby,  Abrams,  Wurmser,  Perle.

Monday, March 10, 2014

Counter-Intelligence Metanoia


"An extraordinary work by a gifted filmmaker, "Counter-Intelligence" shines sunlight into the darkest crevices of empire run amok. The film vividly exposes a monstrous and unconstitutional "deep state" in which multiple competing chains of command -- all but one illegal -- hijack government capabilities and taxpayer funds to commit crimes against humanity in our name. Anyone who cares about democracy, good government, and the future will want to watch all five segments of this remarkable film." - Robert David STEELE Vivas: CIA, USMC, OSS, Earth Intelligence Network and Founder, Phi Beta Iota the Public Intelligence Blog

Judaism's First Century Diversity Far from uniform, Jews disagreed over the way to honor their traditions and practice their faith.
Samuel Ungerleider Professor of Judaic Studies and Professor of Religious Studies Brown University

William Goodwin Aurelio Professor of the Appreciation of Scripture, Boston University

Professor of Classics and Director of the Religious Studies Program University of Texas at Austin

Shaye I.D. Cohen:

History Crash Course #33: The Great Revolt In a seemingly suicidal move, the Jews take on the mighty Romans.
A rebellion against Rome in the 1st century CE would be the equivalent today of Israel declaring war on NATO. That's how mighty Rome was.
So how did the Jews decide to take on such a seemingly suicidal challenge? This question has a number of answers. Into the equation enter:

  • Ideological differences between the pagan Greco-Roman world and the monotheistic Jewish world
  • The Jewish response to the Roman domination which led to strife among the various Jewish factions: the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Zealots
  • Roman persecution of Jews which started with taxation and ended with outright slaughter
We will look at them one by one.

Ideological Differences

 Like the Greeks, the Romans worshipped many gods. Not only that, whenever they conquered a swath of land, they simply added the conquered peoples' gods to the Roman pantheon. The Roman historian Varro writes that by the 1st century BCE they had in excess of 30,000 gods. (1)...

Jewish Strife
The Jewish reaction to the presence of the Romans ― who were dominating the Holy Land and worshipping idols ― had many faces.

 Hellenized and assimilated Jews
 The Sadducees.
 The Pharisees...

Roman Persecution
Adding fuel to the ideological fire was the way the Romans tried to extract money ― by taxation and sometimes outright looting ― from the local population. This was especially true of several of the governors (procurators) of Judea who were exceptionally cruel and avaricious. Josephus provides us with numerous examples of Roman mistreatment of the Jewish inhabitants of Judea: